Legal Opinion

Scudder v. Union National Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 29, 1875No. 33PublishedCited by 285 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern (District of Illinois. This was an action of assumpsit against William H. Scudder and others, constituting the firm of Henry. Ames & Co., to recover the amount of a bill of exchange. Process was served only upon.

Read the full summary

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern (District of Illinois. This was an action of assumpsit against William H. Scudder and others, constituting the firm of Henry. Ames & Co., to recover the amount of a bill of exchange. Process was served only upon. Scudder, who pleaded non-assumpsit and several special pleas. . The statute of Illinois on which one of the pleas is based provides that no action shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant upon any special promise to answer for the débt, default, or miscarriage of another person, “ unless the promise or agreement…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

It is not necessary to examine the question, whether a denial of the motion to set aside the summons can be presented as a ground of error on this hearing. The facts are so clearly against the motion, that the question does not arise.

Nor does it become necessary to examine the question of pleading, which is so elaborately spread out In the record. The only serious question in the case is presented upon the objection to the admission of evidence and to the charge of the judge.-

Upon the merits, the case is this : The plaintiff below sought to recover from the firm of Henry Ames & Co., of St.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Townsley v. SumrallSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. Chapman v. RobertsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  5. Miller v. TiffanySupreme Court of the United States · 1864

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by285 opinions

  1. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Perlmuter Printing Co. v. Strome, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API