Legal Opinion

Ohio Ex Rel. Superintendent of Banks v. Eubank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1940No. Docket No. 102, Calendar No. 41,068PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

The problem before us is the validity of a judgment confessed in Ohio by virtue of a purported warrant of attorney. The judgment must be respected if the warrant of attorney conferred the necessary jurisdiction on the Ohio court!} First National Bank of Athens v. Garland, 109 Mich. 515 (33 L. R. A. 83, 63 Am. St. Rep. 597) ;* Acme Food Company v. Kirsch, 166 Mich. 433 (38 L. R. A. [N. S.] 814); Jones v. Turner, 249 Mich. 403; Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240; Carroll v. Gore, 106 Fla. 582 (143 South. 633, 89 A. L. R. 1495, 1503). Compare Eg ley v. L. B. Bennett & Co., 196 Ind. 50 (145 N. E.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Holder v. AultmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Carroll v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Bell v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co. v. Holly's, Inc. (In Re Holly's, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
  3. William P. Wells D/B/A Recmart, Cross-Appellant v. 10-X Manufacturing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. McDade v. MoynihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API