Wilson v. Kryger
North Dakota Supreme Court
From a judgment of tbe District Court of Kidder County, Hon. W. H. Winchester, Judge, defendant appeals. Tbe contract in tbis case must be canceled in Minnesota, where it was made, 3-ud under tbe procedure of that state provided. Finnes v. Selover, B, & Co. 102 Minn. 334, 113 N. W. 883; Walsb v. Selover, B. & Co. 109 Ninn. 136, 123 N. W. 291. Tbe lex loci contractus governs in tbe cancelation of a land sale contract.
Read the full summary
From a judgment of tbe District Court of Kidder County, Hon. W. H. Winchester, Judge, defendant appeals. Tbe contract in tbis case must be canceled in Minnesota, where it was made, 3-ud under tbe procedure of that state provided. Finnes v. Selover, B, & Co. 102 Minn. 334, 113 N. W. 883; Walsb v. Selover, B. & Co. 109 Ninn. 136, 123 N. W. 291. Tbe lex loci contractus governs in tbe cancelation of a land sale contract. Selover, B. & Co. v. Walsb, 226 U. S. 112, 57 L. ed. 146, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 69. Tbe contract itself involves certain rights of tbe parties, irrespective of where tbe…
1Opinion of the CourtGoss, J.
This is an action to determine adverse claims. Defendant answers that he is interested as the holder of a contract of sale of the land involved. By reply it is alleged said contract was canceled for defaults thereunder. Trial was had at a regular term, defendant failing to appear. On plaintiff’s proof the court made findings, conclusions, and order for judgment, upon which judgment was entered quieting title in plaintiff. Defendant’s appeal is governed by chap. 131, Daws of 1913, as was held in this action. Wilson v. Kryger, 26 N. D. 77, 51 L.B.A. (N.S.) 760, 143 N. W. 764. Subsequently and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Selover, Bates & Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Emery v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Polson v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Leu v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Proctor v. ProctorIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Asociacion De Reclamantes v. The United Mexican StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Morris v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Mills v. RoggensackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Permann v. Knife River Coal Mining Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.