Legal Opinion

L. J. Hablas v. Armour and Company, a Foreign Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1959No. 16028_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, L. J. Hablas, from final judgment dismissing his complaint against defendant, Armour and Company, for damages for fraud and tortious discharge. 1 Plaintiff, as a result of the termination of his employment by defendant, has lost all rights in defendant’s pension fund, except the right to the return of his contributions.

Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship and the requisite jurisdictional amount.

Plaintiff was continuously employed by the defendant from 1910 until his discharge on July 15, 1955, except for a period of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Louis W. Repsold, Jr. v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  4. Mann v. Policyholders' National Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Tamm v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Peterson v. Scott Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Buehner v. HoevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Shaw v. KruidenierDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API