Legal Opinion

Crowley v. New York Telephone Co.

Nassau County District Court

Decided January 15, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles P. Marchese, J.

After trial the court finds in favor of defendants and dismisses plaintiff’s complaint.

In this action plaintiff sues in small claims to recover the sum of $170 which he claims to be an “ easement fee ”. Plaintiff maintains he should be paid because the defendant New York Telephone Company has permitted defendant Cablevision, Inc. (amended to Communication Development L. I. Corp. as defendant) to install on the New York Telephone Co. poles located on plaintiff’s property certain cablevision equipment pursuant to an agreement between the two defendants, for which no permission was sought from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Staminski v. RomeoNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Petra Cablevision Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henley v. CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Centel Cable Television Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hoffman v. Capitol Cablevision System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Devon-Aire Villas Home. v. Americable Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Hoffman v. Capitol Cablevision Systems, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API