Legal Opinion

Roche v. Curtin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 17, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

The plaintiffs, real estate brokers, brought the defendant owners and a customer together upon a price which the owners had agreed with the brokers to take, and the customers had agreed with them to pay, for the owner’s property, but the sale was not consummated because of the failure of the plaintiffs to render financial assistance which they had agreed to give the customer to enable him to purchase the property. Some months later the customer himself procured the necessary funds and purchased the property. The plaintiffs claim to be the procuring cause of the sale. With such corrections of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Rosenfield v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Housatonic Valley Insurance Agency, Inc. v. KlipsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Finch v. DonellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Neville v. YaknunasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Kane v. BrunneauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Pentin v. GonsowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API