Legal Opinion
Pentin v. Gonsowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 19, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The plaintiff sued the defendants for a broker’s commission for the sale of real estate in Dan-bury. The court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed.
The controlling facts found, which are not subject to material correction, may be thus summarized: On August 22, 1947, the defendants, husband and wife, had for years owned a farm in Danbury. It consisted of about 110 acres; exactly how much acreage they owned did not appear. The house and bams were situated near a highway. In 1937, the defendants had listed the farm for sale with Carl Hibbard, a real estate broker.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rosenfield v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Housatonic Valley Insurance Agency, Inc. v. KlipsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Fisher v. HansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Seward v. M. Seward & Son Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Busker v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Pitt v. KentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Thomas F. Rogers, Inc. v. HochbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Kane v. BrunneauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Smith v. Frank R. Schoner, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.