Kane v. Brunneau
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.
This is an action for a broker’s commission on the sale of real estate formerly owned by the defendant. The court rendered judgment for the defendant and from that judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
The finding may be summarized as follows: In the early part of 1951 the defendant owned an apartment house, known as the Gloria Apartments, in Waterbury. In the previous year he had placed the property on the market at $125,000, and this fact was generally known by real estate brokers. In the latter part of March or the first week of April, 1951, the plaintiff telephoned the defendant, saying…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosenfield v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Seward v. M. Seward & Son Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Roche v. CurtinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Neville v. YaknunasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pitt v. KentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Metz v. Hvass Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Richter v. DrenckhahnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Marshall v. Sturgess & Jockmus, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Nicastro Associates, Inc. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.