Legal Opinion
Gooding v. Underwood
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Marquette. (Stone, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiffs brought suit against defendants on the following order:
“Marquette, Mich., March 22, 1890. “Messrs. Underwood & Gardner,
“ City.
“Gentlemen: Please pay to Gooding & Ormsbee, or order, $413.31, with interest at eight per cent, per annum, and charge same to our account.
“Hetting & Bergh.”
This order was- presented by plaintiffs to defendant Underwood, who indorsed it as follows:
“Accepted on conditions that the amount is due H. & B. on final settlement for contract work on Dead Biver Bailroad.
“J. M. Underwood.
“March 26, 1890.”
The declaration contains a special count setting forth *189the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Meister v. BirneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Cicotte v. GagnierMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sheffield Car Co. v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Dean v. CrallMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Bollstrom v. Duplex Power Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Pearson v. HardinMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Kennedy v. Lynch Timber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.