Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. Trespass on the case. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.
This case has been before in this court, and is found reported in 41 Mich. 453, to which reference is made for a statement of the facts and a diagram, showing the location of the bridge, swing, property of the plaintiff, etc.
*281Two questions of primary importance have, with others, been argued and submitted in tbe present case, and these were not passed upon on the former hearing;
First, Did the evidence introduced tend to prove an estoppel as against the plaintiff' or his grantor Hart, so that damages could not now be recovered against the company % and,
Seoondk/, Did the action of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Conely v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sheffield Car Co. v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Salliotte v. King Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Donohue v. VosperMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Marquette County Savings Bank v. KoivistoMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.