Legal Opinion
Wasko v. Manella
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 15, 2005No. AC 22286PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. In Wasko v. Manella, 269 Conn. 527, 550, 849 A.2d 777 (2004), the Supreme Court reversed the decision of this court in Wasko v. Manella, 74 Conn. App. 32, 811 A.2d 727 (2002), with direction to consider the defendant’s remaining claims on appeal. These claims are that the trial court (1) improperly precluded the plaintiff subrogor Brian Wasko from testifying as to his understanding of the scope of coverage of his homeowner’s insurance policy and (2) improperly determined that the substitute plaintiff subrogee,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Glaser v. Pullman & Comley, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Palmieri v. CirinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Henderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Connecticut Community Bank v. Bank of GreenwichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.