Legal Opinion
Brogan v. Holland
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided December 13, 1995No. Civ. A. 2:95-0143PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are the cross motions of the parties for summary judgment: 1
THE PENSION PLAN
Mr. Brogan seeks disability retirement benefits from the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust. He applied for a disability pension based on a stroke that allegedly occurred while he was working in the mines on the nightshift of December 17 and 18,1986. The Trustees denied Mr. Brogan’s application for a disability pension on March 7, 1988. Article II. C. of the 1974 Pension Plan describes the eligibility requirements:
A participant who (a) has 10 years…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Darling v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Hurley v. HollandDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- Offenberg v. Olin Corp. Long-Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998
- Offenberg v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997