Brown v. State

Appellant was convicted of conspiring with others to commit a felony. The only alleged errors presented are with respect to the overruling of her motion for a new trial. The causes in that motion here relied upon are as follows:

“15.—For error of law occurring at the trial in this to-wit: That the court erred in permitting the following question to be asked and answered by George Simpson, to-wit:

Q. ‘Now, before this robbery was committed, had you and this defendant talked about any other robberies V

Mr. Clarence Rumer: ‘I want to object to the question because it is not material to the issue in…