Kimmick v. Linn

The appellants were plaintiffs below and brought an action in three paragraphs against the appellees to quiet title to certain real estate. The appellees answered in general denial. There was a court trial, resulting in a judgment in favor of the appellees. This appeal is predicated upon the denial of appellants’ motion for a new trial, in which it is assigned: (1) That the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence; (2) that the decision is contrary to law; and (3) that “the court erred in permitting the defendant, Rose Linn, to testify as to matters occurring prior to the death of…