Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Served February 27, 1984
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided May 18, 1984No. GJ-84-1-JLQPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
QUACKENBUSH, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on John Doe’s Motion to Quash or Modify two (2) subpoenas duces tecum which were served on him February 27, 1984. A hearing was held in Seattle, Washington on April 2, 1984 at which John Doe (hereinafter “petitioner”) appeared with his counsel Robert Whaley. Special Assistant United States Attorneys Bruce Carter and Francis Burke represented the government. Subsequently, on May 14, 1984, a telephonic hearing was held in which Mr. Whaley, Mr. Burke and Mr. Carter again participated.
One of the subpoenas was…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re ConnellyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (85-W-71-5)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings: Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Larry Danbom and Western Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Pratt v. KirkpatrickAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. HubbellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.