Legal Opinion
Pratt v. Kirkpatrick
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1986No. S-658, S-710PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a final order of the superior court enforcing an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued by appel-lee, Willis F. Kirkpatrick, Director of the Division of Banking, Securities and Corporations of the Alaska Department of Commerce and Economic Development. Appellant, Elmer Pratt, maintains that he is privileged from complying with the subpoena by virtue of the protections against self-incrimination provided in the fifth amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Alaska Constitution, as well as the right to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ABC TOWINGCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
- Huffman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Division of Banking, Securities & CorporationsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- L.H. v. Y.M.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. ShumakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.