Legal Opinion
Keller v. Keller
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1933No. Docket No. 4669PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The respondent secured a decree of divorce from the appellant on the ground of extreme cruelty. The real and personal property possessed by the spouses was divided between them. It was all held as community property. In a cross-complaint the defendant also asked for a divorce from the plaintiff on the ground' of cruelty. This was denied. From the interlocutory decree which was entered the defendant has appealed.
A reversal of the judgment is sought on the grounds that the interlocutory decree is not supported by the evidence chiefly because it is asserted the alleged acts of cruelty are not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Percy v. PercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Putnam v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dressler v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Myers v. Metropolitan Trust Co. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Risco v. ReussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.