Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1930No. Docket No. 4131PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUTTRELL, J., pro tem,

In this action the plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce from the defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty. By the judgment or decree plaintiff was awarded the custody of the two minor children of the parties, one, a boy thirteen and one-half years of age at the time of the decree and the other, a girl ten and one-half years old. Provision was made in the decree for the support of the children by the defendant and he was required to pay to plaintiff a stated sum as her attorney’s fee in the action. The decree also disposed of the community property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Percy v. PercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Crum v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Minnich v. MinnichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Shapiro v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Keller v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Griffith v. GriffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API