Legal Opinion

Norristown Auto. Co., Inc. v. Hand

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1989No. 2262PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In a lis pendens action 1) will the requirement of the pendency of a prior action be satisfied where the two complaints are filed on the same day and 2) will the requirement of “identity” be satisfied, where the same parties bring separate actions in different counties, based on the same events, but where the actions assert different theories of recovery.

Appellant Norristown Automobile Company (Norristown) operates a car sales business in Montgomery County. Appellee Arthur Hand was employed by Norristown as its used car manager. On December 5, 1987, Norristown fired Hand believing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hessenbruch v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. FlaminiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Penox Technologies, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Raw v. LehnertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. PNC Bank v. Bluestream Technology, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Barren v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Crutchfield v. Eaton Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Davis Cookie Co., Inc. v. WasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Hillgartner v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API