Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. Vitek
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C. J.:
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to discharge a writ of attachment.
The affidavit for the writ of attachment stated that the defendant, appellant herein, was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $511,811 “upon an express contract for the direct payment of money, to wit: $511,811.” Such affidavit followed the wording of NRS 31.010 providing for the issuance of the writ: “ (1) In an action upon a judgment or upon a contract, express or implied, for the direct payment of money * * The complaint was in two counts, the first being for $117,611 and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Doud v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Allen v. Merchants Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- California Packing Corp. v. KatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. VitekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Clarence Morris, Inc. v. VitekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. VitekNevada Supreme Court · 1969