Legal Opinion

Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. Vitek

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1964No. 4741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to discharge a writ of attachment.

The affidavit for the writ of attachment stated that the defendant, appellant herein, was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $511,811 “upon an express contract for the direct payment of money, to wit: $511,811.” Such affidavit followed the wording of NRS 31.010 providing for the issuance of the writ: “ (1) In an action upon a judgment or upon a contract, express or implied, for the direct payment of money * * The complaint was in two counts, the first being for $117,611 and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Doud v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Allen v. Merchants Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
  5. California Packing Corp. v. KatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. VitekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Clarence Morris, Inc. v. VitekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. VitekNevada Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API