Legal Opinion
Clarence Morris, Inc. v. Vitek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1969No. 22351PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
412 F.2d 1174
CLARENCE E. MORRIS, INC., a California corporation duly authorized to do business in the State of Nevada, Appellant,
v.
Alvin J. VITEK and United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington corporation duly authorized to do business in the State of Nevada, Appellees.
No. 22351.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
June 17, 1969.
Carl J. Christensen (argued), Stanley W. Pierce, Las Vegas, Nev., for appellant.
Rex A. Jemison (argued), of Singleton, De Lanoy, Jemison & Reid, Las Vegas, Nev., for appellees.
Before HAMLEY, HAMLIN and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. VitekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Glen Earl Grigg v. Southern Pacific Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2003-NC10 v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Ian Watson v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Karen Nolan, et al. v. Columbus Life Insurance Company, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Metcalf v. Walmart Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022