Legal Opinion

Doud v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1929No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, P. J.

This is an appeal hy the plaintiff, an attaching creditor, from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County dissolving an attachment. Plaintiff brought suit to recover from defendant the sum of $1375 damages from breach of a contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant.

The complaint alleges that the contract was entered into on the twenty-seventh day of June, 1926, under the terms of which plaintiff purchased from defendant, who was engaged in a business known as the Fontana Fur Industries, sixty-four rabbits, sex does, for breeding purposes, paying therefor the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. S. C. V. Peat Fuel Co. v. TuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Hamilton v. Baker-Hansen Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Powers v. FreelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Eaton v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API