Legal Opinion

California Packing Corp. v. Kato

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1920No. Civ. No. 2968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County denying a motion to dismiss an attachment. William S. Wells, Judge. Reversed. The facts are .stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

[1] This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss an attachment. The action was brought by respondent to recover damages from the appellant, by reason of a breach of his agreement to sell and deliver a crop of tomatoes. It is alleged in the complaint that under the terms of the contract between the parties the defendant agreed to sell and deliver, and plain tiff agreed to buy, when the same became ripe and ready for delivery, all tomatoes grown on a designated parcel of land. The price agreed to be paid was the sum of fifteen dollars per ton. The damage alleged is the difference…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Allen v. Merchants Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sturtevant v. K. Hovden Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Bullard v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. VitekNevada Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API