Legal Opinion
United States v. Donald Wanland, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2016No. 14-10170PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OWENS, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Donald Wanland, Jr. appeals from his jury convictions and sentence for tax related charges, including tax evasion. Although Wanland raises many arguments challenging his convictions and sentence, none has merit, so we affirm the district court in all respects. 1
I. Factual Background
Wanland was a successful civil attorney in Sacramento, California, and his law practice generated considerable income. In the 1990s, he entered into two partnership agreements with Richard Bernstein — the Law Offices of Wanland and Bernstein (from which Wanland drew his income)…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. Crest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Austin CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- First Mortgage Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Hart (In re Hart)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2016
- Patients Mutual Assistance Collective Corporation d.b.a. Harborside Health Center v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
- Patients Mutual Assistance Collective Corporation d.b.a. Harborside Health Center v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.