Legal Opinion

Gross v. Wright & Callender Building Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1931No. Docket No. 6813PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Plaintiff was the owner and operator of a clothes cleaning and pressing business which he conducted in a storeroom which was a part of a certain building to and for the use of which the defendant furnished steam for heating and other purposes. By means of a tunnel the steam was conveyed in an eight-inch pipe to a point beneath a basement of the building of which plaintiff’s storeroom was a part and which basement was directly underneath the storeroom occupied by plaintiff. Prom the eight-inch pipe in the tunnel the steam was carried by a two-inch pipe to a boiler in the basement and from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Luengene v. Consumers Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Memphis Consol. Gas & Electric Co. v. CreightonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Gibson v. Hercules Manufacturing & Sales Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coats v. HathornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Hanson v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Coats v. HathornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API