Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Hess

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1931No. Docket No. 581PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and affirm the judgment upon the ground that appellants’ opening brief does not conform to the requirements of Rule VIII of Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the state of California. The appeal comes up on a typewritten record.

Under appellants’ opening brief filed herein, the only ground for reversal that we would be required to consider, in view of the rules of this court, is the alleged error of the trial court in giving instructions to the jury and in refusing instructions requested by them.

Appellants have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richmond Terminal Corp. v. Parr Terminal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Burns v. Renaker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Gross v. Wright & Callender Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coats v. HathornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Coats v. HathornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API