Legal Opinion

Coats v. Hathorn

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1932No. Civ. No. 526Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Fred R.Coats and Versa Coats, and R. E. Hathorn and Mrs. R. E. Hathorn were husbands and wives. Mr. and Mrs. Coats instituted separate actions in the court below to recover damages from Mr. and Mrs. Hathorn for personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Coats and for actual damages and loss of services of his wife suffered by Mr. Coats, both resulting from an accident in which an automobile driven by R, E. Hathorn struck Mrs. Coats and *259seriously injured her. The two cases were consolidated and tried together. Separate verdicts and judgments were rendered in favor of each plaintiff against R. E.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peters v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Lowe v. San Francisco & Northwestern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Richmond Terminal Corp. v. Parr Terminal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Burns v. Renaker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Gross v. Wright & Callender Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API