Legal Opinion
Cross v. Arkansas Forestry Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1991No. 90-1838PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are Arkansas Forestry Commission employees who seek overtime compensation and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. (West Supp.1991). The employees appeal two orders of the district court granting summary judgment to the Commission. The orders determined that the employees were not entitled to overtime compensation under the FLSA for time spent on subject-to-call status, or to liquidated damages for the Commission’s violations of the FLSA.1 We reverse the *914judgment denying compensation during subject-to-call status, but…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marshall Martin, Jr., on Behalf of Himself and All Other Employees of the Ohio Turnpike Commission Similarly Situated v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Ray Cross v. Arkansas Forestry CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Jonites v. Exelon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Garrett J. Dinges and Christine Foster v. Sacred Heart St. Mary's Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lurvey v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.