Legal Opinion

Jonites v. Exelon Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 3, 2008No. 07-3053PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to analyze the relation between section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley), 29 U.S.C. § 185, which authorizes federal suits to enforce collective bargaining agreements, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seg., the federal minimum-wage and maximum-hour law. The plaintiffs represent a class (an “opt-in” class under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b); see Harkins v. Riverboat Services, Inc., 385 F.3d 1099, 1101 (7th Cir.2004)) of more than a thousand linemen and other hourly workers employed by Commonwealth Edison.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Jirak v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  3. Affymax, Inc. v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Jose Ageo Luna Vanegas v. Signet Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. Musch v. Domtar Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API