Legal Opinion

Alexander Bisno and Sally Bisno v. Marvin F. Hyde

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1961No. 17061_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Hyde sued the bankrupt Bisnos as co-partners in this diversity action for fraudulent conversion of some $12,000.00 sent to Alexander Bisno by Hyde to purchase an interest in the soon-to-be bankrupt Moulin Rouge hotel-gambling house at Las Vegas, Nevada. The Bisno business in Las Vegas was carried on under the fictitious name of Nevada Real Estate Loan Company. After a trial before the court, findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment were entered in favor of Hyde in the amount demanded. Obviously the purpose of the suit is to frustrate 1 for Hyde the bankruptcy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Mud Control Laboratories v. CoveyUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Peach Motor Express Company v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peerless Mills, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Third-Party v. Hertz, Warner & Co., a Partnership, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Dwinell's Central Neon v. Cosmopolitan Chinook HotelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Blow v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Hoefer v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Harry David Zutz Insurance Inc. v. H. M. S. Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API