Legal Opinion

Peach Motor Express Company v. Salmon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1946No. 31115, 31120PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Was the allowance of the amendment to the original petition error? The written objections to such allowance1 alleged: “1. That there was not enough in the original petition to amend by, for the reason that in the original petition there was a misjoinder of causes of action, in that the plaintiff was seeking to set up a cause of action based in trover, and another cause of action stated against the codefendant, Milner Motor Company, was based upon an illegal use of process or the use of an illegal process, and further that there was a misjoinder of parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Rogers v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Lovell v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. HartleyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1967
  2. Alexander Bisno and Sally Bisno v. Marvin F. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Freeney v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API