Legal Opinion

Blow v. Shaughnessy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1984No. 8310SC340PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether it was proper for the Superior Court to deny the defendants’ motions to stay proceedings in the trial court pending arbitration of the matters raised in plaintiffs’ complaint. We hold that it was.

I

The underlying suit here involves a group of investors, plaintiffs, who are suing the person to whom they allegedly entrusted their money, defendant Shaughnessy, along with three national stock brokerage firms and named individual securities dealers employed by those firms. The complaint alleges that defendant Shaughnessy and the individual securities…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Routh v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Sciolino v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. International Creative Management, Inc. v. D & R Entertainment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Barnhouse v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Carter v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API