Legal Opinion
Hoefer v. Hall
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1965No. 7679PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant to recover on a promissory note in the amount of $5,000.00, executed and delivered to him by the defendant and alleged to be for monies loaned.
The defendant admitted the execution and delivery of the note but affirmatively answered, among other things, that simultaneously with the execution of the note, and as a part' of the same transaction, the parties entered into a limited partnership agreement which required the plaintiff to pay to the defendant $5,000.00 in exchange for a 5% interest in the partnership when the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Lanier v. BowdoinNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Homestake Mining Co. v. Mid-Continent Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Gilman Paint & Varnish Co. v. LegumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Mud Control Laboratories v. CoveyUtah Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Peerless Mills, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Third-Party v. Hertz, Warner & Co., a Partnership, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Dwinell's Central Neon v. Cosmopolitan Chinook HotelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Shindler v. Marr & Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.