Legal Opinion

Dwinell's Central Neon v. Cosmopolitan Chinook Hotel

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 22, 1978No. 2412-3PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

— Cosmopolitan Chinook Hotel (Cosmopolitan) appeals from a summary judgment, holding it liable as a general partnership — and not as a limited partnership — in connection with an action brought by Dwinell's Central Neon (Dwinell's) for breach of contract.

On October 25, 1972, Cosmopolitan and Dwinell’s entered into three separate agreements for the lease-sale of neon signs. Dwinell's was represented by one of its salesmen and Cosmopolitan was represented by two of its partners. The contracts contained an acceleration clause in the event of Cosmopolitan's default and a provision for a reduction…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Island Air, Inc. v. LaBarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Lundgren v. KierenWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Rathke v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Meyer v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Alzado v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Sparks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API