Legal Opinion

In Re Cole

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 2002No. 01-BG-1209PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent John W. Cole faces reciprocal discipline for two suspensions imposed by the Supreme Court of Kansas. In November 1999, respondent was suspended for one year for multiple ethical violations, 1 having exhibited a “lack of competence ... at every stage of the representation.” In re Cole, 268 Kan. 171, 991 P.2d 422, 425 (1999). His reinstatement was conditioned on his passing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination. Another client filed a complaint against respondent alleging a lack of diligence and failure to communicate. Respondent did not file a response as directed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re BergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In Re ColeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In re WillinghamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re ReisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In Re DragerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API