Legal Opinion

In Re Berg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1997No. 96-BG-269PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals of Maryland suspended respondent from the practice of law in that state indefinitely based upon evidence that respondent had diverted to his own use the proceeds of fee checks payable to his partners and other lawyers at his law firm in Delaware. The Maryland suspension was based on respondent’s conduct in Delaware, for which he received a “private admonition” in that state. We ordered the Board on Professional Responsibility to determine whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed on the basis of the Maryland discipline. The Board rejected, as do we, respondent’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. In Re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In Re SamuelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. In Re ALDRIDGEDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In Re ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. In Re WeissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. In Re FreedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re ChasnoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API