Legal Opinion

Ehrhart & Associates, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1960No. Civ. 24871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem.*

Petitioner seeks mandate to compel the respondent Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles to vacate its order staying proceedings relating to petitioner’s application and petition for the appointment of an arbitrator and for an order directing arbitration, and to require the respondent court to proceed to appoint an arbitrator, or with a summary trial on the issue of whether or not the contract between petitioner and the real party in interest herein has been rescinded. Demurrer and return to such petition by respondent court and answer and return thereto by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Drake v. SteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stephan Riess and Thelma McKinney Riess v. C. W. Murchison and Simi Valley Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. Atilano v. BryonSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
  3. Ehrhart & Associates, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API