Legal Opinion

Kalmus v. Kalmus

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1951No. Docket Nos. 17534, 17672, 17700PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, P. J.—

Appellant Natalie M. Kalmus and respondent herein Herbert T. Kalmus, were married in Massachusetts in 1902. On December 22, 1921, in an action instituted by appellant herein she secured a divorce by decree nisi from respondent Kalmus herein, which decree became final June 23, 1922. By the terms of this divorce decree, respondent Kalmus was ordered to pay to appellant herein the sum of $7,500 per year as alimony. It is conceded that such payments have been made continuously to the present date and are still being made by respondent Kalmus and being accepted by the appellant herein.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Carbone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Brown v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Siggelkow v. SiggelkowAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Evola v. Wendt Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API