Legal Opinion
Stephan Riess and Thelma McKinney Riess v. C. W. Murchison and Simi Valley Development Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 1967No. 20679_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This case comes before us for a second time. In a decision reported at 329 F.2d 635, we reversed in part and remanded to the district court, which thereafter stayed its proceedings and ordered the parties to proceed to arbitration. The propriety of that ruling is here at issue.
The jurisdiction of the district court was founded on diversity of citizenship; appellants Riess are citizens of California, while appellee Murchison is a citizen of Texas and the Simi Valley Development Company — the other appellee — is organized under the laws of Delaware and has its principal…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. v. Westchester Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Teledyne, Inc., Teledyne Canada Limited, and Teledyne Cm Products, Inc. v. Kone Corporation, Outokumpu Oy and Rammer Oy, Finnish CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Jay F. Swanson v. Stan LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Gregg Kendall & Associates, Inc. v. KauhiHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.