Legal Opinion
County of Santa Cruz v. McLeod
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1961No. Civ. 19171PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COAKLEY, J. pro tem. *
This ease involves the right of the plaintiff-appellant, county of Santa Cruz, to recover Old Age Security (OAS) payments made to Mary McLeod, defendant-respondent, during the time that she was ineligible to receive such payments. The complaint sought recovery of $4,262.89. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff for $302.60 and costs. The plaintiff appeals. There is no dispute on the facts. The legal questions are (1) which statute of limitation is applicable and (2) when did the applicable statute commence to run?
The Facts
In 1947 respondent signed the requisite papers and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Estate of MehusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- DOE(s) v. Boy Scouts of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Forcier v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Amie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- J. C. Peacock, Inc. v. HaskoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.