Legal Opinion

Amie v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1979No. Civ. 21246PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner is the defendant in an action in respondent court by which the County of Riverside, real party in interest herein, seeks reimbursement of public assistance and establishment of child support for Lorina Amie, born May 8, 1964. Petitioner demurred to the complaint to the extent that it sought recovery of public assistance paid for the support of Lorina more than three years before the filing of the complaint. In opposing the demurrer, the county contended that it was entitled to reimbursement for all assistance paid for the support of Lorina, beginning in January…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re Marriage of ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rodríguez Avilés v. Rodríguez BeruffSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  2. Anthony Booth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. In Re Dale H. Visness, Debtor. Dale H. Visness v. Contra Costa County Contra Costa County District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. In Re Joe P. Ramirez, Jose Presiado Ramirez. County of Santa Clara v. Joe P. Ramirez, Jose Presiado RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. City and County of San Francisco v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API