Legal Opinion
Forcier v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 13, 2000No. C 99-01989 SBAPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on (1) the Motion of defendants Aha! Software Corporation (hereinafter “Aha!”) and Greg Stikeleather for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims; (2) the Motion of Defendant Microsoft Corporation (hereinafter “Microsoft”) for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts Two and Six; and (3) the Motion of plaintiffs Mitchell D. Forcier and Marathon Development Corporation (hereinafter “Marathon”) for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint. Having read and considered all the papers filed in connection…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ultimax Cement Manufacturing Corp. v. CTS Cement Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Mediostream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Callaway Golf Co. v. Dunlop Slazenger Group Americas, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Gognat v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.