Estate of Dimond
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Although never decided in South Dakota, many jurisdictions hold that, as a general rule, an unexplained transfer of money or property from a parent to a child creates a rebuttable presumption that the transfer was intended as a gift. In this case, nine months after a mother gave her son $25,000, he died. Declaring that the money was a loan, she sought reimbursement from her son’s estate as an unsecured creditor. In a hearing to resolve the mother’s claim, the circuit court applied the presumption of a gift and ruled that it could be rebutted only by clear and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Bank of Rockville Center Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Brightbill v. BoeshoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stockwell v. StockwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Hubbard v. CITY OF PIERRESouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Davis v. Ssd Dept. of Ed.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Gumbs-Heyliger v. CMW & Associates Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2014
- Stavig v. StavigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.