Legal Opinion

Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 27, 1959PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

Plaintiff is beneficiary of an insurance policy covering the life of his late father, Donald Hinds. The policy provides for payment of a death benefit of $9,000 and, in addition thereto, of a like sum in the event the death of the assured should be due to bodily injuries sustained solely through “violent, external and accidental means.” Suit was brought in behalf of plaintiff, a minor, by Emily Hinds, his mother and legal guardian. It is not disputed that the death of the assured being shown, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the ordinary death benefit of $9,000. The jury, however, awarded…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  2. State v. O'ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Ruebsamen v. MaddocksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API