Brightbill v. Boeshore
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
The question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish a valid gift inter vivos of 670 shares of stock of Brightbill Body Works, Inc.
Plaintiff, executrix of Brightbill’s estate, filed a complaint in equity to recover as an asset of her husband’s estate 670 shares of the common stock of said Company represented by stock certificate No. 1. Bright-bill died testate on September 7, 1953 leaving a very badly drawn holographic will dated January 27, 1951. In that will he “bequeathed” and transferred to his second wife, Stephanie…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rynier EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Yeager's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Kaufmann's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Connell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Chapple's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Ashley v. AshleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Petro v. Secary EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Commonwealth Trust Co. v. SzaboSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Martella EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.