Legal Opinion

Brightbill v. Boeshore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1956No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

The question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish a valid gift inter vivos of 670 shares of stock of Brightbill Body Works, Inc.

Plaintiff, executrix of Brightbill’s estate, filed a complaint in equity to recover as an asset of her husband’s estate 670 shares of the common stock of said Company represented by stock certificate No. 1. Bright-bill died testate on September 7, 1953 leaving a very badly drawn holographic will dated January 27, 1951. In that will he “bequeathed” and transferred to his second wife, Stephanie…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rynier EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Yeager's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Kaufmann's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Connell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Chapple's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ashley v. AshleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Petro v. Secary EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. SzaboSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Martella EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API