Legal Opinion

Stockwell v. Stockwell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2010No. 25412PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Lloyd Stockwell initiated this action to quiet title to property deeded to him by his father, Cecil Stockwell, Sr. (Cecil Sr.). Cecil Stockwell, Jr. (Cecil Jr.), Bruce Stockwell, John Stockwell, and the Estate of Cecil Sr. filed a counterclaim, alleging that Cecil Sr. lacked the testamentary capacity to execute the deed and that the deed was the product of undue influence. 1 The trial court entered a judgment quieting title and recognizing the legal validity of and enforcing Cecil Sr.’s warranty deed in favor of Lloyd. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] Cecil Sr. was born on…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Melter v. MelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Engesser v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Jacobs v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Huether v. Mihm Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API