Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Chandler
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 2003No. CV-02-0060-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice (Retired).
¶ 1 The automobile accident from which this case arose occurred in Arizona, but everyone involved was a California resident. The tort action that followed was filed in Arizona; it is timely if the Arizona statute of limitations applies but barred if California’s applies. We granted review to examine choice-of-law principles and determine whether the Arizona or California statute of limitations governs. Rule 23(c)(3), Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. We have jurisdiction under Article VI, § 37 of the Arizona Constitution.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In August 1997,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pesnell v. ArsenaultCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Vicki Pounders v. Enserch E&C IncArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Pesnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mann v. GTCR Golder Rauner, L.L.C.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.