Legal Opinion
Pesnell v. Arsenault
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 15, 2008No. 04-56721PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed on July 1, 2008, and appearing at 531 F.3d 993 (9th Cir.2008), is amended as follows: At 531 F.3d at 996, after the first sentence of the last paragraph, insert the following as a footnote: “As noted below and in the concurring opinion, Pesnell’s claims, including his constitutional claims, are barred to the extent that they rest upon the same misrepresentations alleged in the dismissed Arizona action.”
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Simmons v. HimmelreichSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- James King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Blixseth v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Winnemem Wintu Tribe v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.