Legal Opinion

Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1995No. CV-94-0098-PRPublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is a breach of contract action arising out of a written lease for space in the building formerly known as the Valley Bank Center in Phoenix. Plaintiff law firm Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson (“Gust”) entered into the lease with Valley Bank Building, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Valley National Bank (VNB). Gust filed this action against VNB’s successor, Prudential Insurance Company.

The primary issue on appeal is whether the statute of limitations bars Gust’s claim. The trial court applied the “discovery rule” and concluded that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of MontrealNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. Crandall Dry Dock Engineers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  4. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API