Legal Opinion
Ahern v. Dillenback
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 6, 1991No. D012493PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
Joan and David Ahem appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment. At issue is whether the terms of Insurance Code 1 section 11580.2 regarding mandatory uninsured motorist coverage apply to a policy issued to cover driving in Europe and North Africa.
Facts
In September 1982, the Aherns, residents of Connecticut who were visiting Monterey, California, decided to purchase an automobile insurance policy that would provide coverage for their upcoming anticipated travels in Europe. The Aherns contacted Ray Dillenback of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Fitzpatrick v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Paper Savers, Inc. v. NacsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Carleton v. TortosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.